invariance

Jun. 24th, 2025 09:40 pm
fury_of_the_forests: (Default)
Translation is something that both fascinates me and.. in a way.. I find repulsive in the same sense that considering the vastness of the unknown ocean does. It's, quite literally, unfathomable.

*smiles* Someone use to call me that. I'd ask if they knew how much I loved them, and they'd stroke me and say no, I was so deep, they could not fathom me.

Translation is like that to me. I think one of the canonical examples of this is "hiraeth" being untranslatable from Welsh to English. It's not really, it's just not a one-to-one translation. It means longing, something akin to nostalgia, or even homesickness. It's used in banal language, though it's often prescribed very poetic undertones.

There are words with less literary aspirations that still carry a lot of cultural information with them - "tiddies" for example. Sure, we can translate that to breasts, but would one use the two words interchangeably? No, because some additional nuance is there. I was reading something recently that made the claim that "tiddies" and "titties" even carry slightly different connotations, and where you might use tiddies to refer to an anime character, you'd use titties for an actual human pair. What about 'tit'? Other slang, are they analogous? Is there any difference in use between age, class, sex, sexuality, etc... demographics?

Whenever we translate something, we run the risk of missing out on some nuance. Some richness is, inevitably, lost. It cannot be helped. The human experience as a whole is a set of untranslatable qualia.

Does this mean that we should never seek to be known? Are we even knowable? And if not, does that mean we shouldn't try?

Intimacies

Mar. 2nd, 2025 08:24 pm
fury_of_the_forests: (Default)
This post is going to be full of stuff that some folks would deem TMI, so be forewarned. I'm ALSO going to try to keep it vague enough that I can keep this post public.

I often like to chew on thoughts of identity, and spending time with friends often gives me more opportunity to do so. There's the general who are we, who do we show up as with others (vs with different others), who do those people perceive us to be, does their perception have any baring on our true self? if intent isn't magic, impact matters more, then the weight is not on who we say we are, but on our actions, and how those actions are interpreted by others. But also sometimes something much more specific will come up, and it's like OH, huh.

Such a thing happened this weekend when I was hanging out with a group of friends that as a whole we've known each other a bit over a decade now. Who I am, and what I do, has changed a great deal within that time. I had JUST come out of a toxic situation at the start of this, and for a bit I dated another member of the group. We were poly (I mean, we both, individually, still are) and both rather into PDA, and we occasionally hooked up with others, both together and separately, and we're both very sex-positive, had no shame dictating we hide these things. We remained friends after, even cohabitating for a few years, before they moved out of state for better work prospects. I was young(er), and very open to trying new experiences in the hope of finding what worked best for me after the end of a much, much more restrictive relationship (not just in terms of romantic entanglements, but the whole expression of who I was). There was very much this.. freedom to it. And as it should've been, to be honest. I said that I've never made a bad decision that I regretted, and that honestly not only was all of it great learning opportunities, but many provided really fun stories to add to my "lore".

But a friend referred to me as "thirsty". Like currently. I was really taken by surprise by it and said I disagreed. She said "but you're so sexual and it's been so long for you" - and she's not wrong. The scenarios that I found myself in 10yrs ago are definitely not my current reality - but nor is it anything that I'm looking for. Hence my disagreement.

I think she sees how much I've been mourning my last relationship, which was about a year and a half ago, and thinks "they'd be so much better if they had a diversion". And she may even be right. I DO miss not just that specific person, but also that specific 'genre' of connection. But she is focused on the sex - and I get that, because when it suits, I AM still a highly sexual creature - but who I am now, ideally wants BOTH kinds of intimacy.

Listen; I love my friends dearly, and if they need a hand or anything with something that I can help with, I'm down. But I don't want to conflate things, because that isn't what I'm craving-- I miss having a PARTNER with whom sex just a continuation of the act of communion with, where, for lack of less woo terms, we are connecting heart, soul, mind, and body. Like... I cannot seem to find grandiose words enough - the human cosmic mycelial-like connection.

I think I'm at a point in my life where I'm pivoting. I don't know that most folks EVER have a single someone with whom they get to feel that - and if so, then I've been far, far too blessed to complain about not having it more often, or any longer. I'm not saying that I'm not open to the possibility, but it's time to move on from an active desire, because that desire is causing pain and suffering. In the sense of taṇhā and tṛ́ṣṇā then, yes, I guess that I AM "thirsty", heh, but I think I'm transitioning into a period of... pruning all of that so that I can better control my growth.

Gwrthryfel

Feb. 12th, 2025 09:34 am
fury_of_the_forests: (Default)
Today's morning reading was about not putting off things, because death always awaits us. The end is nigh! etc. It's alarmist, but also not incorrect. This kind of sentiment is often used to back up grind culture, where every moment of your life, in capital letters, MUST BE PRODUCTIVE!! It's a sentiment, that though I am generally a fan of Stoicism, is one of the things that I don't align with. I'm maybe borderline hedonist in this regard. If you get joy out of always working and doing? Cool, I guess, do you (though, have you unpacked the whys of that?) But there's really, in my opinion anyway, no particular reason to do so. Your worth is not based on your production, your value, your humanity, etc. The only meaning your life has is what you assign to it, and the idea that you're working yourself to the bone, in a way that you don't enjoy or get some sort of pleasure out of.. that seems really dour to me.

On the other hand, a friend of mine wrote this morning about the work that needs doing (and not knowing WHAT to do). She wrote on a world scale, but on a personal scale, I'll liken it to my veggie garden I've been working on. Do I enjoy the physical labour of building raised beds, of hauling many tonnes of soil, etc? I mean, a little bit I do, but mostly no. It is filthy, and hot, and tiring. But I DO want veggies to eat, and so I recognise that that work must get done.

I've taken to wearing very subtly subversive t-shirts to work. Today is my Dylan Thomas shirt with a snippet of his "Do Not Go Gentle" poem. I recognise that it's a poem about death, but I've always extrapolated it to be about defiance more generally. If folks want us to die, must we lay down for them? If folks WANT us to panic, to do nothing more than work ourselves into exhaustion so that we're unable to to fight back, should we comply? Let sullen fatigue strip us of our humanity?

Maybe the work that we must continue on is within ourselves, in finding ANY remaining joy. Maybe it is outward, in creating that joy for others. Are we tired, are we worried and morose - absofuckinglutely. But maybe that's work we need to do anyway... maybe we should rage against the dying of the light in whatever way best suits us.
fury_of_the_forests: (Default)
I've been rewatching Arcane, this time with Riordon (somewhat by force, admittedly) largely because I wanted to discuss it's themes with someone. I've consumed A LOT of critical analysis related to the 'sisters' character arc, and I DO feel that some of that (ie: Powder/Jinx's identity) is clearly part and parcel with the issue of identity (if this is not clear enough subtext, it becomes full blown TEXT in S2E8), but I've seen folks dismiss the Jayce/Viktor arc as being too convoluted, but I find it the most interesting in part because it IS subtle, it IS complex, it is also very rarely addressed in pop media AND it is not completely separate from the concept of identity. In fact, I'd argue that Powder/Jinx represents this on a personal/micro level, and Jayce/Viktor represent it on a much larger, macro, and universal level.

The Theseus Ship paradox has always been my pet thought experiment. Like, I think knowing that is integral to knowing ME, it's been so important to my foundational thought processes for a very long time - long before I even understood 'philosophy' was an area of study. I instinctively applied to it humans, rather than ships, or axes, or knives. I've come to no concrete determination (I don't even know how folks would come to immovable positions on such things) - I'm not strictly team bundle theory nor team ego - but I find it a comforting perceptional puzzle to pull out on any cozy evening and play with.

So when considering this as pertains to Arcane, and specifically the Jayce/Viktor arc(s), there's an aspect of determinism and fate that interests me deeply. Can there be some aspect of the self that is so untransmutable that fate - not just in a personal sense (though certainly that), but also in something more universally impactful - can hinge on that trait? And if so, what kind of trait would that be?

Profile

fury_of_the_forests: (Default)
fury_of_the_forests

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223 2425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 04:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios